D dropped in favour of C# for PSP emulator

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 5/11/12 9:55 PM, jerro wrote:
>> Yes, "in" for statically-sized arrays does make sense because the
>> complexity if bound at compilation time.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> But complexity is not the only problem with the proposed
> operator in for arrays. That operator does not represent the
> same operation as operator in for associative arrays.

That's a good argument, but then you may think of the array as a small 
set, which would have the same semantics.

Andrei