Request for Review: DI Generation Improvements

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, May 14, 2012 23:46:08 Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:11:50 -0700, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > On Monday, May 14, 2012 23:03:20 Adam Wilson wrote:
> >> I have updated the make files so that only core.thread and core.sync.*
> >> are
> >> run through DI generation. ALL other core.* modules are copied into the
> >> import directory now.
> > 
> > I assume that object.di and core/thread.di are being used rather than
> > their
> > corresponding .d files being run through the .di generation? They
> > already have
> > hand-crafted .di files.
> > 
> > - Jonathan M Davis
> 
> The funny thing is that core.thread.di was being run through the DI
> generator in the old make file. I had left it that way, I have posted a
> commit that moves it to the copy section.

Well, if that works... It's weird though, because there's no reason to have a 
thread.di if it's not used, and as I understand it, some work was being done 
that required some of Thread's internals _not_ be in the .di file, but I don't 
remember the details, and I don't know where that stands.

- Jonathan M Davis