Live code analysis in DCT

[Roman D. Boiko]

On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 13:21:58 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
wrote:
> [from here: 
> http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/contributing-to-dct.html ]
>
> Is there any real reason for such a decision, beyond 
> aesthetics?  The whole point of permissive licences such as MIT 
> and Boost is that you can incorporate that code into other 
> projects without prejudicing the broader licence choice of the 
> codebase.  Doesn't seem worth enforcing such a licensing 
> constraint if the MIT-licensed code is useful.

I intend to keep front end under a single license. If somebody 
later decide to use code generation from SDC, they will be able 
to do that, but that will be another project. As for the rest, I 
doubt there would be much to reuse anyway because of different 
design approaches. Thus I don't think that benefit is worth 
introducing code under a different license.

(I also asked whether it is possible to switch SDC license to 
Boost some time ago, but didn't get any response.)