Destructor nonsense on dlang.org

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-05-26 14:28, foobar wrote:

> Huh? In my model FooA has no destructor.

Hm, right. But if a destructor of a class isn't guaranteed to be called, 
how can it guarantee that the struct's destructor will be called?

> I indeed propose that structs allocated with "new" will be put in region
> of the heap *not* managed by the GC. It's a tiny price to pay to get
> more orthogonal semantics which are easier to reason about.
> Please note that this only affects code that directly uses pointers
> which is not common in D and is geared towards more advanced use cases
> where the programmer will likely want to manage the memory explicitly
> anyway.

I see.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg