CTFE slower than expected

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-05-29 14:37, Manu wrote:

> That's interesting. I can probably give that a shot.
> So you think that's a bigger cost than the CTFE code that generates the
> strings?

I don't know. I just did a test with Derelict that needed to be 
compatible with D1 and D2 and therefore used string mixins for things 
like __gshared.

For example:

http://www.dsource.org/projects/derelict/browser/branches/Derelict2/DerelictGL/derelict/opengl/glfuncs.d#L699

Putting all those declarations in their own string mixins make a difference.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg