synchronized (this[.classinfo]) in druntime and phobos
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu May 31 11:17:58 PDT 2012
On 5/31/12 5:19 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> The solution consisting in passing a delegate as parameter or as
> template is superior, because it is now clear who is in charge of the
> synchronization, reducing greatly chances of deadlock.
It can also be a lot clunkier for certain abstractions. Say I want a
ProducerConsumerQueue. It's much more convenient to simply make it a
synchronized class with the classic primitives, instead of primitives
that accept delegates etc.
Nevertheless I think there's merit in this idea. One thing to point out
is that the idiom can easily be done today with a regular class holding
a synchronized class private member.
So we got everything we need.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list