[ ArgumentList ] vs. @( ArgumentList )
Ali Çehreli
acehreli at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 6 13:22:32 PST 2012
On 11/06/2012 01:19 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> Le 06/11/2012 22:07, Tavi Cacina a écrit :
>> On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 19:18:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> No hitting below the belt! Let the games begin!
>>
>> @
>>
>>
>
> Who will make that even shorter ?
Not shorter but definitely more in line with C and C++ heritage:
static() with optional ()
Ali
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list