std.signals2 proposal

[eskimo]

On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 11:16 -0800, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:36 AM, Robert <jfanatiker at gmx.at> wrote:
> > 
> > I just developed a proof-of-concept implementation of an improved
> > std.signals. 
> 
> Make sure that the behavior when calling std.signals operations from within a callback is well-defined.  It should either explicitly disallow this or, ideally, support it with deterministic results.

I am pretty sure I don't understand what you mean. Calling std.signals
methods from an invoked slot is as safe as from any other random
function. Am I missing something?