Const ref and rvalues again...
Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 10:30:25 PST 2012
11/7/2012 9:04 PM, martin пишет:
> On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 14:07:31 UTC, martin wrote:
>> C++:
>> void f(T& a) { // for lvalues
>> this->resource = a.resource;
>> a.resetResource();
>> }
>> void f(T&& a) { // for rvalues (moved)
>> this->resource = a.resource;
>> a.resetResource();
>> }
>>
>> D:
>> void f(ref T a) { // for lvalues
>> this.resource = a.resource;
>> a.resetResource();
>> }
>> void f(T a) { // rvalue argument is not copied, but moved
>> this.resource = a.resource;
>> a.resetResource();
>> }
>
> You could probably get away with a single-line overload, both in C++ and D:
>
> C++:
> void f(T& a) { // for lvalues
> // convert a to mutable rvalue reference and
> // invoke the main overload f(T&&)
> f(std::move(a));
> }
>
> D:
> void f(T a) { // rvalue argument is not copied, but moved
> // the original argument is now named a (an lvalue)
> // invoke the main overload f(ref T)
> f(a);
> }
Yup, and I'd like auto ref to actually do this r-value trampoline for me.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list