Trying to get the most out of the current 'shared' system

[deadalnix]

Le 12/11/2012 14:23, Sönke Ludwig a écrit :
> Am 12.11.2012 14:00, schrieb deadalnix:
>>
>> With some kind of ownership in the type system, it can me made automagic
>> that shared is casted away on synchronized object.
>
> Yes and I would love to have that, but I fear that we then basically get
> where Bartosz Milewski was at the end of his research. And unfortunately
> that went too far to be considered for (mid-term) inclusion.
>
> Besides its shortcomings, there are also actually some advantages to a
> library based solution. For example it could be allowed to customize the
> lock()/unlock() function so that locking could work for fiber-aware
> mutexes (e.g. http://vibed.org/api/vibe.core.mutex/ ...) or even for
> network based distributed object systems.

Don't get me started on fibers /D