hashed array?

[bearophile]

Andrej Mitrovic:

> I think we could really use some syntax support for sets.<

I don't agree. I think in D there is no real need for built-in 
support for sets, despite built-ins are handy. It's better to 
leave the compiler changes to things that can't be implemented in 
library code, like a good syntax for tuple unpacking and other 
things.

I think the only feature you can't implement in D is "full" 
operator support for set comparisons, because currently D 
operator overloading doesn't allow you to define ">=" and ">" 
independently. But this is a minor limitation that doesn't 
justify built-in sets.

Bye,
bearophile