I'm back

[Dmitry Olshansky]

11/15/2012 5:20 PM, monarch_dodra пишет:
> On Thursday, 15 November 2012 at 12:57:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> It's looking like this comes down to either banning ranges with transient
>> fronts entirely (and changing how ByLine and ByChunk work), or we're
>> going to
>> have to deal with quirks like array(map!"a.dup"(file.byLine())) not
>> working
>> whereas array(map!"a.idup"(file.byLine())) does work.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> I still say this could be "simply" solved the same way we solved the
> "size_t" indexing problem: Only ranges that have non-transient elements
> are guaranteed supported by phobos algorithms/functions.
>
> Everything else: Use at your own risk.
>

Yeah! Let's introduce undefined behavior into the standard library!

Wrong type of index at least breaks at compile time.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky