A simple question

[Don Clugston]

On 16/11/12 05:15, Rob T wrote:
> On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:41:45 UTC, Stugol wrote:
>>> Event_t e2;        // Will compile!
>>
>> Yeah but that kinda blows, doesn't it?
>>
>
> I found it surprising or unintuitive that the !() is required, and I do
> want to know what is the reasoning behind it,

One of the oldest open enhancement requests is on this topic:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012

I don't what the reason is. It'd be interesting to revive the patch 
there, and see if it passes the compiler test suite.