@property needed or not needed?
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 21:28:50 PST 2012
Le 18/11/2012 22:52, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
> On 11/19/12 1:02 AM, Rob T wrote:
>> So what's up with @property?
>
> It's a mistake on top of another. We need to redesign it to such that
> the keyword '@property' is only required in cases that otherwise would
> be ambiguous (functions returning functions).
>
> Andrei
>
It isn't the only ambiguous case.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list