@property needed or not needed?
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 05:26:15 PST 2012
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 12:44:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> Should this be allowed for functions that isn't marked with
> @property:
>
> foo = 3;
Yes. We should *only* be changing the way @property is
implemented. (Namely, actually implementing it!)
Don't want to break existing code. The new changes must be opt in.
If there's both an @property setter and a regular function, the
property should be used here.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list