popFrontExactly?

[monarch_dodra]

On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 08:42:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> I think that we'll probably need to add them in this case due 
> to efficiency
> concerns, but it's not without cost. We don't want too many 
> stray functions
> doing almost the same thing in Phobos.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I'd say it's all a matter of presentation. I'm sure they can all 
easily be regrouped into what feels like "a neat family of 
functions". What counts is the perceived complexity, more than 
the actual amount of function names. They aren't quite overloads, 
but it doesn't make them much more complex than, say, the "to" 
functions.