The future of UDAs.

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/28/2012 07:38 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> So you're saying that UDAs are mutable after all? You can change a UDA
> but you can't add a new one, right? If that's the case, it will solve
> ALL my problems. I'll have all types marked with my struct and BAM! I
> have mutable compile-time variables, which I solely needed.
> ...

There is no such thing as a 'mutable compile-time variable'. How would 
such a thing behave? The term is meaningless until this is explained.