The sorry state of the D stack?

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 10/06/2012 10:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Definitely not. *DSource* is dying, unfortunately, which has lead some
> people to assume the same of the rest of D. But no, D is going very
> strong, and has only been getting bigger.

Might be worth placing some prominent message on DSource stating that it's being 
maintained to document all the D1 work and projects, but that the active work is 
now over at dlang.org?