Any interest in libgit bindings?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-10-10 23:04, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:

> Mine compiles but I'll have to reference some inlined functions since
> they're not exported in the DLL. Yours looks very similar (you almost
> can't go wrong with generating C bindings, it's very easy compared to
> C++).

Yeah, I haven't done anything about inline functions yet. Another think 
I haven't been able to figure out yet is to how to properly translate 
include directives. It's not easy to translate to the module system used 
by D.

> Btw, you should try to rename a module from 'object' to '_object' or
> similar, otherwise it might conflict with the implicitly imported
> object module in druntime. Walter flagged this as wontfix
> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7651).

Right, I missed that. It's easy to forget this kind of symbols, they're 
not really keywords but they are kind of reserved words. Any other 
symbols behaving like this I could have missed?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg