D seems interesting, but...

[Kagamin]

On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 20:19:22 UTC, Gerry Weaver wrote:
> When running dmd, none of the read (and friends) syscalls 
> happen as far as the kernel is concerned. This would lend some 
> credibility to the lib theory. However, it's quite odd that 
> results are the same for each time dmd is executed. I would 
> expect a random result or even a segfault/abort on different 
> runs.

Shouldn't the application be terminated when a library fails to 
load?