Bits rotations

[bearophile]

Iain Buclaw:

> In the gdc-4.6 package you have there, it's only naked asm that 
> can't be inlined.

Good.


> However it is worth noting that DIASM is no longer in mainline 
> gdc.

What's DIASM? Is it the D syntax for asm code? If this is right, 
then gdc developers have done a mistake, reducing D code 
interoperability, creating an incompatibility where there wasn't 
(and reducing my desire to use gdc or to switch to it, because I 
have hundreds of lines of inlined asm in my D code), this means 
doing the opposite of what generally compiler writers are 
supposed to do (maybe this topic was discussed already, in past).

Bye,
bearophile