To avoid some linking errors

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/30/12 2:13 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 07:43:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 10/29/2012 11:08 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>> void foo();
>>
>> There will be no line information for the above.
>>
>> > void main()
>> > {
>> > foo();
>>
>> For this, yes, but that is not what is being asked for.
>
> Well, personally I think I would enjoy having this line number. The more
> information the better.

Not sure I'm following but essentially if foo() is undefined the most 
interesting file/line references would be for all calls to foo(). The 
lines declaring foo() are nice to have but much less interesting.

Andrei