scope for array parameters

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 01:50:12 bearophile wrote:
> > I believe that the only case that
> > has _any_ protection at all with scope right now is delegates,
> > which almost never should be const.
> 
> Do you mean code like this? What's bad about this? My delegate
> arguments
> /function pointer arguments are usually const.
> 
> void foo(const int delegate(int) dg) {}
> void main() {
> foo((int x) => x);
> }

If you have delegates that work with const, then great, but in my experience 
(which frequently involves storing the delegate as a member variable), const 
doesn't play nicely at all with delegates.

- Jonathan M Davis