DIP33: A standard exception hierarchy - finally blocks not executed for Errors
Dicebot
m.strashun at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 04:54:12 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 11:42:01 UTC, Don wrote:
> I think that view is reasonable, but then I don't understand
> the reason to have Error in the first place! Why not just call
> some kind of abort() function, and provide the ability to hook
> into it?
I actually support something like this. While adding hooks for an
non-recoverable error conditions is a valid use-case, it is
better to keep it explicitly separate from usual error
(exception) handling framework to keep clear that it is an
advanced tool and hardly @safe.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list