About the Expressiveness of D

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-03 04:13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> Yes, though I've had complaints before about a pull being too much code where
> the unit tests were considered part of the code, and the reviewer thought that
> number of lines was too great to be worth adding, even if the number of lines
> of normal code was relatively small. And that sort of attitude would just lead
> to not properly unit testing stuff. And while we do some great unit testing
> (the built in unit test feature is a _huge_ success in that regard), there are
> at least some areas where we really need to step up our game on that (with
> ranges in particular given all of the variations of them there are and how
> many static if branches many range-based functions have).

The problem is having the unit tests in the same file. Yes, I know, most 
of you love it, I don't.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg