My thoughts & tries with rvalue references

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 17:48:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> It would interest me which of the suggestions would be rather 
> accepted.
>  - scope ref as Kenji suggested
>  - Or rather @ref because this is the way that D usually goes 
> when it comes to subsequent expansions.
>
> What do you think?

I am against introducing new one-symbol meanings, it always looks 
like a hack. scope ref is much more elegant but I still can't get 
straight in my mind what this combination does mean from the 
abstract type system point of view.