Formal Review of std.process

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-05 07:37, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:

> In light of this, here's a suggestion:  How about we, rather than
> updating the old std.process, create a new module called
> std.sys.process?  Or even better, IMO, std.sys.environment and
> std.sys.pipe as well as std.sys.process?

I like that, to have a "sys" package.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg