DIP32: Uniform tuple syntax

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 4/6/13 4:10 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Zach the Mystic:
>
>> Not disagreeing, but you had mentioned nullable types before, and I
>> was wondering what they might look like also. Have you made an
>> enhancement for these I could examine?
>
> I opened this:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4571
>
> Part of the syntax is:
>
> T? means T nullable
> T@ = means not nullable.
>
> But that ER is a confused mess, and in the meantime the @disable was
> introduced. Now the probability of such nullable syntax+semantics to be
> introduced in D is very low, so probably I will close down that ER.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

I think it's safe to close it. Nullable types have not enjoyed a lot of 
appreciation in C#.

Andrei