DIP attack

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-08 10:34, Dicebot wrote:
> There has been quite an explosion of DIP count recently. With just 3
> states (Approved/Superseded/Draft) it becomes quite hard to have a quick
> overview of what actually happens on topic.
>
> Shouldn't more precise categorization be added? I can imagine
> (Draft/Approved - Needs Implementation/Implemented/Rejected/Needs
> Improvements) as minimal useful state set. Some of DIPs rot there for
> eternity with an uncertain future.

I think we need something similar to the review queue. Also, what's the 
point of DIP's if none of the core developers are looking at them. I'm 
pretty sure that I've seen several DIP's that have no comments from 
Walter or Andrei.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg