Formal Review of std.process

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 11:17:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-04-08 11:17, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>
>> Because there are symbols with those names defined in both 
>> std.stdio and
>> core.stdc.stdio, and I got naming conflicts all over the 
>> place.  This
>> was a while ago, though, and the compiler may have seen 
>> improvements in
>> this area since then.  I'll try it out later.
>
> I would say that something's wrong if one needs to come up with 
> special naming schemes for function arguments.

You sound surprised that there is something wrong in the world of 
software development. :)

I've changed the parameter names now.  The auto-tester seems to 
approve, so I guess the compiler bugs have been fixed.  Thanks 
for pointing this out!

Lars