To help LDC/GDC

[David Nadlinger]

On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 18:15:11 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> The three levels (weakly pure/strongly pure/impure) are needed,
> but a redesign would perhaps use a different keyword for weakly
> pure.

Why should it?

I mean, using another name for "pure" would arguably make sense, 
given the confusion it seems to have caused in the past. But if 
you are suggesting to differentiate between various "kinds of 
purity" on a keyword level, I'm not sure what benefits you are 
hoping to get.

David