UFCS for struct opCall?

[Timon Gehr]

On 04/09/2013 12:21 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>...
>
> I don't think this makes any sense. Constructor are not regular
> function. The bug lies in the fact that this work and not in the opCall
> not working IMO.
> ...

On 04/09/2013 11:03 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Furthermore, the only argument brought up against this so far is that some
> language constructs are special and ergo they must be mutually incompatible.
> This is a complete non sequitur.

I still do not get what this is about.