UFCS for struct opCall?

[bearophile]

deadalnix:

> I don't think this makes any sense. Constructor are not regular 
> function.

 From studying functional languages like Haskell I have learnt 
that considering "constructors" like the other functions gives 
some advantages. The uniformity of the idea of "function" is very 
useful.

What you are saying here has no content, so it has no value (it's 
equivalent to a -0 vote). If you want to put an argument you have 
to explain what are the practical disadvantages/risks in D of 
calling a struct opCall with the UFCS.

Bye,
bearophile