Vote for std.process

[Manu]

On 12 April 2013 18:21, Dicebot <m.strashun at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 08:14:25 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>
> While I generally agree with your point, std.process is hardly the place
> to start from. It is not performance-critical functionality and it is not
> basic functionality that may be used in other critical modules. It is
> blaming consequences instead of reasons, not really practical.
>

And I generally agree with your point. Like I said, I would have made this
criticisms of whatever came alone ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130412/66e5785a/attachment-0001.html>