Vote for std.process

[Andrea Fontana]

On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 04:46:52 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> It is that time, If you would like to see the proposed 
> std.process include into Phobos please vote yes. If one 
> condition must be met specify under what condition, otherwise 
> vote no.
>
> std.process by Lars Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer is a 
> suggested improvement to the existing std.process and is a 
> major change to the API. The original API remains but these 
> will be going through deprecation.

Yes.

A compiler warning like for deprecation should added for 
"experimental" IMO rather than use exp. vs std.