Vote for std.process

[Jesse Phillips]

On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 06:25:10 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I see this pattern where something is designed, discussed, and 
> then voted
> into phobos. At this time the design looks good on paper, but 
> there is very
> little practical experience using the library.
> The problem then is, once accepted, people start using it, and 
> at some
> point some issues are found, or ideas for improvement are made 
> based on
> user experience, but the module can no longer be touched due to 
> the general
> phobia of making breaking changes...

I think this needs to happen prior to the formal review/voting. I 
would say it should be a precursor to starting the official 
review, however this would raise the bar too high for things like 
Jacob's Serialization library; he has a working library, but it 
isn't ready for Phobos and it would be silly to require the 
translation prior to approving it for Phobos.

How we choose to add to the exp module would need some 
consideration.