Formal Review of std.process

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-04-12 13:05, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:

> Then let me ask you/them this:  Would you prefer it was implemented as a
> module-level @property function that returns a singleton class instance
> instead?  In other words, would you have the same API with slightly
> worse performance and more complicated implementation, *just* for the
> sake of a strict naming convention?
>
> Note that 'environment' (with that name) was added to std.process years
> ago.  As Jesse mentioned, the fact that it was a class was just hidden
> from documentation with an alias.  Unfortunately, this prevented proper
> documentation of its members, so changed it.

Ok, I see. I have don't have _that_ strong feelings about this. I also 
wouldn't have any problem of using it as class, like it is:

Environment["foo"] = "bar";

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg