'exp' vs 'std'? Forked: Vote for std.process

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 4/12/13, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hence my lamenting for a way to stop it :)

So that's what that was because I couldn't understand it (need a
coffee refill honestly). :p

> 2. Add std.module with your suggested version statement, that publicly
> import std.exp.module

Yeah it might work, I just hope it doesn't run into one of those nasty
cyclic/public import bugs. E.g.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9919

But it probably won't be a problem. 9919 is about cyclic imports, as
long as phobos doesn't import the module with a public import all
should be fine methinks.