'exp' vs 'std'? Forked: Vote for std.process

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 4/12/13, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:16:09 -0400, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 17:27:58 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> 1. Add std.exp.module with the API as it will be WITHOUT warnings
>>
>> exp.module?
>
> Right.

I'd rather we keep it under "std" to avoiding stealing a name that an
external library might already use (it's not stealing per se but it
might introduce conflicts).