'exp' vs 'std'? Forked: Vote for std.process

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 4/15/13, Timothee Cour <thelastmammoth at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you call it another module name (say exp.process), then:
>
> A) you would not be able to test how the rest of phobos interacts with
> the new std.process unless you also temporarily changed the source
> files in phobos to include exp.process instead of std.process (messy).

But you can't test it otherwise. If the two std.process APIs are
different and you change the import switches when building your own
code, the code in Phobos will stop compiling.