Is there any plans to make working signals in D?

[Denis Shelomovskij]

17.04.2013 15:26, Timon Gehr пишет:
> On 04/17/2013 12:35 PM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> It will make code in Issue 9603 work.
>>
>
> You have to argue why this is the correct way to fix it. Why would
> lifetime control necessarily be linked to implicit object field overhead?

0. I do like this approach, it looks straight and consistent IMO.
1. I see no other ways to fix the issue.
2. I see no important overhead in my proposal as wasting a few bytes is 
nothing in contrast with GC allocation process/memory overhead.
3. I think added functionality is very usable and even already required.

Everyone is free to propose a better approach.

By the way, almost every technical idea we know is incorrect and will be 
likely superceeded in the future with a better one as history shows.

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij