Is there any plans to make working signals in D?

[Denis Shelomovskij]

18.04.2013 18:21, deadalnix пишет:
> On Thursday, 18 April 2013 at 13:25:32 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
>>>  - What is the fundamental problem.
>>
>> When a delegate is created information about it's outer scope is lost
>> instead of being stored in it's ptr.
>>
>
> That doesn't mean anything. No information is stored into a ptr except
> an address in memory.

A joke? Of course I mean "stored into a memory ptr point to".

>
>>>  - Why this fundamental problem is a language issue and not a lib one.
> ...
> I don't care about the cost. You have made no point in 3 pages in favor
> of the change you propose. Not even an invalid point I can disagree on.
>
>> As everything I have written above is known, I still don't understand
>> why you are telling about signal fixing as a main problem as it is
>> just an example of problems that occurs when we throw away outer scope
>> information without any practical reason, IMO.
>
> It is an example of a library interface issue (very real). To propose a
> language change, you must show that this limitation is in fact a symptom
> of a deeper cause, which it at language level (so that must be fixed at
> language level).

Another try to describe the problem:

When I get a delegate, I'd like to use it unless it become invalid.

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij