Stable D version?

[David Nadlinger]

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 07:50:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 22 April 2013 at 14:25:21 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>> On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 19:58:14 UTC, Tourist wrote:
>>> What's holding you from releasing a version now and declaring 
>>> it stable for e.g. a year?
>>
>> What would be the benefit of just declaring one release stable?
>>
>> This is not a trick question.
>>
>> David
>
> I have raised this topic several times already. Stable version 
> that is guaranteed to never break user code but still receives 
> non-breaking bug-fixes is important for corporate adoption - 
> those will never agree to spend some tome in the middle of 
> running project to fix some unknown breakage created by a tool.

Okay, maybe it was somewhat of a trick question after all: 
"Tourist" put it as if all that was required was to mark a 
certain version stable, and I wanted to hint at the fact that 
this alone wouldn't help anybody at all.

David