rvalue references

Tue Apr 23 07:05:08 PDT 2013

On 23 April 2013 21:32, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> On 04/23/2013 09:07 AM, Namespace wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 03:30:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> Previous discussions:
>>>
>>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/**4F84D6DD.5090405@digitalmars.**
>>> com#post-4F84D6DD.5090405:**40digitalmars.com<http://forum.dlang.org/thread/4F84D6DD.5090405@digitalmars.com#post-4F84D6DD.5090405:40digitalmars.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=9238<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9238>
>>>
>>
>> I still like the Idea of DIP 36 (http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36) with scope
>> ref / in ref. ...
>>
>
> That's fine. I don't.
>

Can you suggest a superior/more sensible approach?
I can't see the fault in DIP36's reasoning. It just makes sense. Why is
everyone so against it? I'm yet to understand a reason...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130424/bbe4ea45/attachment.html>