DIP 36: Rvalue References
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 23 12:51:36 PDT 2013
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:40:35 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
> Safety should be guaranteed in @safe code. There is no point in
> conservatively disallowing perfectly fine @system code on the basis of
> safety concerns, unless, of course, the type system is advanced enough
> to prove safe all relevant use cases.
I agree with this. If @safe code is all that is affected, we will be well
off. We can also disallow known bad cases in non- at safe code.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list