rvalue references

[Zach the Mystic]

On Friday, 26 April 2013 at 21:21:50 UTC, Diggory wrote:
>> You're just asking for bugs if you allow ref to accept 
>> rvalues. We've had problems like this before when some 
>> literals were treated as lvalues. The behavior of a function 
>> which takes its argument by ref and the behavior of one which 
>> takes its argument by auto ref are fundamentally different.
>
> The only purpose of rvalue references is to allow the callee to 
> mutate the value... Otherwise you would just use a const ref.

The forum I'm using suggests that your post was written in 
response to me, although it is not my writing!