Stable D version?

Dicebot m.strashun at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 00:44:14 PDT 2013


On Monday, 29 April 2013 at 06:45:32 UTC, eles wrote:
> ...

D is simply in no shape to compete for kernels for same reasons 
it is rather painful to use in embedded (fat runtime, language 
features relying on hidden gc allocations etc.) It is hardly 
practical to discuss the moment to compete when it is not an 
option from technical point of view.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list