trusted purity?
monarch_dodra
monarchdodra at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 04:32:31 PDT 2013
On Monday, 29 April 2013 at 11:15:20 UTC, Henning Pohl wrote:
> I've been working on a pull request and came up with something
> like this:
>
> private void initialize(A...)(auto ref A args)
> {
> auto m = cast(void* function(size_t size) pure)&malloc;
> _store = cast(Impl*) enforce(m(Impl.sizeof));
> auto r = cast(void function(in void* p, size_t sz) nothrow
> pure)&GC.addRange;
> static if (hasIndirections!T)
> r(&_store._payload, T.sizeof);
> emplace(&_store._payload, args);
> _store._count = 1;
> }
I always forget you can cast the type of a function...
> The purity of "emplace" depends on the purity of the ctor
> called. I'm not sure how to fix that.
I'm not sure there's anything to fix there: If the CTor is not
pure, then how could emplace be pure?
I did some work on emplace that is awaiting to be pulled, which
should improve its purity.
On Monday, 29 April 2013 at 11:19:33 UTC, Henning Pohl wrote:
> By the way, my post is related to the impurity of RefCounted:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Yes, that is also what I am investigating. The cast is would
indeed be a fix for malloc/free. RefCounted's
isInitialized/refCount still need to be marked as pure though.
I'm still worried about what it means for a pure function to
throw... (I'm thinking about the "enforce(malloc)" scheme)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list