Formal Review of std.uni

[Dmitry Olshansky]

29-Apr-2013 22:50, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
> On Monday, April 29, 2013 22:13:09 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>> Technically these should be in std.string and are there but incorrect.
>
> Then fix them there.
>

I think it will take a certain amount of leaked implementation details 
to get it done at least half-decently. In particular to re-use the same 
case-folding table as for case-insensitive matching.

Would be a strategic mistake IMHO to spread the internals across 2 modules.

Then std.string could provide a public alias(es) as it imports std.uni 
anyway?

Going further if we are to preserve the status quo then std.uni will 
declare them as package to not advertise their new location.

> - Jonathan M Davis



-- 
Dmitry Olshansky