purity and memory allocations/pointers
Lars T. Kyllingstad
public at kyllingen.net
Sat Aug 3 15:03:26 PDT 2013
On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 21:19:35 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> Thank the 3 of you for your answers. I think I had a wrong
> preconception of what pure is. I think this cleared most of it
> up.
You may also find this discussion interesting, if you haven't
already seen it:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/i7bp8o$6po$1@digitalmars.com
It basically led to our current definition of "pure".
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list